Some students have believed there was a „hidden data line“ of tech in Scientology, a line on which Scientology tech was given out by me but not made known to students.

This started me looking. For there is no such line.

I wondered if it was a „missed withhold of nothing“. There can be one of these, you know. There is nothing there, yet the auditor tries to get it and the pc ARC breaks. This is „cleaning a clean“ with an E-Meter.

One pc I cleaned up very nicely had been harassed for years about „an incident that happened when she was five“. A lot of people had tried to „get it“. The pc was in a pitiful condition. I found there was nothing there. No incident at all! The meter read came from the charge on previous auditing. I think probably she must have sneezed or her finger slipped on the cans when first asked about „an incident when you were five“.

An auditor who „sees a read“ when there is no charge makes a „missed withhold of nothing“.

This is the other side of the ARC break — the gone something, the non-existence of something. No food. No money. These things ARC break people.

So it is with a „missed withhold of nothing“.

Take Johannesburg. Some years ago the field there was upset by three rabble rousers who alleged all manner of wild things about the Scientology org there. They held wild field meetings and all that. Truth was these three people had done a vicious thing and screamed to high heaven when I sought to query them.

They made a „missed withhold of nothing“ in the field in that area! There was exactly nothing wrong with Scientology there or us. There was something wrong with those three people. They had been stealing from the org.

The field kept looking for what was wrong with the org or us. Nothing was. So it couldn’t be cleaned up because there was nothing to clean. There were three thieves who had run off with org property and defied orders to give it back. How this made something wrong with us is quite a puzzle. They are still „cleaning up this ARC Break“ in Johannesburg! For it is not cleanable, not being there to be cleaned! Unless you realize there was nothing there at all! It’s a missed withhold of nothing. The basic org and staff and we at Saint Hill were just doing our jobs in ordinary routine!

Governments looking for evil in Scientology orgs will go mad (I trust) as they are seeking a non-existent thing. They are easily defeated because their statements are so crazy even their own legal systems can’t help but see it. So it’s easily won.

The only person who goes mad on a missed withhold of nothing is the person who thinks there is something there that isn’t.

So it is with the „hidden data line“ students sometimes feel must exist on courses.

There is no line.

But in this case there is an apparency of a line.

When instructors or seniors give out alter-ised technology or unusual solutions, the student feels they must have some inside track, some data line the student doesn’t have.

The student looks for it and starts alter-ising in his turn pretending to have it when they become instructors.

It’s a missed withhold of nothing.

The whole of technology is released in HCO Bulletins and HCO Policy Letters and tapes I do and release.

I don’t tell people anything in some private way, not even instructors.

For instance, all the instructors I taught to handle R6 we taught by my lecturing or writing bulletins for them. Every one of these tapes is used to teach GPM data and handling to students on the Saint Hill Course.

Any new data I have given on it has been given to all these people.

The instructor then knows only to the degree he has studied and used the very same HCOBs and HCO Pol Ltrs and tapes the student is now using.

There is no „hidden data line“. To believe there is makes an ARC Break.

The apparency is somebody’s pretence to know from me more than is on the tapes and in books and mimeos, or, brutally, somebody’s alter-is of materials. This looks like a „hidden data line“. It surely isn’t.

All the lower level materials are in the HCOBs, Pol Ltrs or on tapes.

All the GPM materials released are here waiting for the student when he reaches that level.

One could say there was one if one was way off the main data line. But it sure isn’t hidden. It’s on courses and in orgs.

I laughed one time at the top flight US Government White House entrusted psychologist. He looked over some startling IQ changes, said such a thing would revolutionize psychology overnight if known and added „no wonder you keep your technology secret!“

That is very funny when you look at how hard you and I work to make it known to all!

The data line isn’t hidden. It’s there for anyone to have. There’s lots of it is possibly a source of trouble in releasing it. But it’s all on courses in Academies or Saint Hill. You could have a copy of everything in the tape library if you wanted. It might cost a lot, but you could have it.

There is no hidden data line.

There’s a lot of data I haven’t had time to write down and put on a line for sheer press of time. But I work hard to do it.

But even my closest staff and communicators when it hears of a new process or plan from me verbally, sees it in an HCOB or HCO Pol Ltr a few days later.

Don‘t for heaven’s sake mistake alter-is by somebody as evidence of a hidden line.

In Scientology we say „If it isn’t written it isn’t true“. That applies to orders. Somebody says „Ron said to . . .“ and on a veteran staff you hear the rejoinder „Let’s see it“. I’ve had raw meat walk into an org and say „Ron said I was to have 25 hours of auditing“. And in the raw meat days of orgs, they sometimes were given it. So we have learned the hard way — “If it isn’t written it wasn’t said“.

And that applies to anybody’s orders, not just mine.

And on tech and policy, it’s equally true. If it isn’t in an HCOB or an HCO Pol Ltr or recorded on a tape in my voice, it isn’t tech or policy.

Next time you hear a pretended order or a squirrel process attributed to me, say „If it isn’t written or recorded it isn’t true“.

And watch how tech results soar then in that area.