Русская версия

Site search:
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Communications - Registered Mail (DIV1.DEP2.MAIL-TEL, 0.COM) - P650526-2
- Correction to P650526 Communications - Registered Mail (DIV1.DEP2.MAIL-TEL, 0.COM) - P650611
- Courts of Ethics (DIV1.DEP3.JUST-SYS, ETHICS) - P650526
- Petitions (DIV1.DEP3.ETHICS) - P650526

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Коммуникация, Заказная Корреспонденция (ц) - И650526-2
- Прошения (ц) - И650526-1
CONTENTS PETITIONS
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 MAY 1965
Remimeo ETHICS

PETITIONS

(Add to HCO Pol Ltr 29 April 1965)

No person under sentence or awaiting a Committee of Evidence may validly petition the Office of LRH.

A petition may only be submitted before or after the full course of Scientology Ethics has been taken.

As all Ethics actions such as a Committee of Evidence are reviewed, in effect a line already exists due to the Ethics action and the facts will be on it.

Therefore a communication from a person under legal sentence from Ethics Officers or a person named in a Comm Ev may not petition. Ethics actions must be permitted to take their course.

A protest from Ethics actions worded as a petition routinely causes further investigation as the “petitioner” is actually only protesting Ethics actions and is handled as such.

L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.rd

[Note: The wording of the first sentence, fourth paragraph of the above Policy Letter, has been amended from the original mimeo issue which read: “Therefore a communication from a person under legal sentence from Ethics Officers or a person named in a Comm Ev may not petition.” ]