link8320 link8321 link8322 link8323 link8324 link8325 link8326 link8327 link8328 link8329 link8330 link8331 link8332 link8333 link8334 link8335 link8336 link8337 link8338 link8339 link8340 link8341 link8342 link8343 link8344 link8345 link8346 link8347 link8348 link8349 link8350 link8351 link8352 link8353 link8354 link8355 link8356 link8357 link8358 link8359 link8360 link8361 link8362 link8363 link8364 link8365 link8366 link8367 link8368 link8369 link8370 link8371 link8372 link8373 link8374 link8375 link8376 link8377 link8378 link8379 link8380 link8381 link8382 link8383 link8384 link8385 link8386 link8387 link8388 link8389 link8390 link8391 link8392 link8393 link8394 link8395 link8396 link8397 link8398 link8399 link8400 link8401 link8402 link8403 link8404 link8405 link8406 link8407 link8408 link8409 link8410 link8411 link8412 link8413 link8414 link8415 link8416 link8417 link8418 link8419 link8420 link8421 link8422 link8423 link8424 link8425 link8426 link8427 link8428 link8429 link8430 link8431 link8432 link8433 link8434 link8435 link8436 link8437 link8438 link8439 link8440 link8441 link8442 link8443 link8444 link8445 link8446 link8447 link8448 link8449
Русская версия

Site search:
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Ethics Chits (DIV1.DEP3.ETHICS) - P651215 (2)
- Ethics Chits (DIV1.DEP3.ETHICS) - P651215
- Gifts (DIV1.HCO) - P651215
- Students Guide to Acceptable Behaviour - P651215

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Правила Поведения для Студентов (ТЕХ, КВАЛ) (ц) - И651215-1R87
- Руководство Студента по Приемлемому Поведению (ТЕХ, КВАЛ) - И651215-1R87
- Руководство по Приемлемому Поведению Студента (ТЕХ, КВАЛ) - И651215R87
- Этические Доклады (ц) - И651215-3
- Этические Записки (ТЕХ, КВАЛ) - И651215-1
CONTENTS ETHICS CHITS
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 DECEMBER 1965
Remimeo

ETHICS CHITS

When anyone receives an Ethics Chit which the recipient feels is incorrect, the answer is not to issue another chit naming the person that issued the first chit. Such action merely sets up a vicious circle of Ethics Chits going between two persons.

The purpose of Ethics is to get Technology and policy in and get the org going, not to start slanging matches. Therefore if anyone receives an Ethics Chit, he or she should first take a good look at his or her actions and see what needs to be done in order to avoid a repetition of the offence.

If, however, after careful consideration they consider the chit really unjustified, they should politely despatch the Ethics Officer, stating briefly their reasons, supported where possible with data and ask for the chit to be withdrawn.

If, in light of the data received, Ethics is satisfied that the chit was incorrectly issued, he/she can return the chit and explanation to the originator asking for the chit to be withdrawn. If the originator decides now to withdraw the chit after seeing the explanation he returns it to Ethics requesting cancellation and Ethics removes the chit from the file.

If the originator is dissatisfied with the explanation the chit should not be withdrawn. The originator sends the despatch and chit back to the recipient with ‘To Ethics — File’ written on it. Ethics infos the receiver and files. In this case, the receiver can if he wishes appeal by despatch to the Ethics Officer and ask for a hearing. Thereupon, the Ethics Officer calls both the originator and the receiver (unless the originator is a Secretary or above) to his office and taking only the facts set out in the receiver’s despatch to the originator, make a quick investigation.

The Ethics Officer then makes one of the following adjudications: —

1. Have the Ethics Chit destroyed.

2. Have the Ethics Chit destroyed if he finds that the Chit was carelessly or incorrectly issued (bearing in mind what information was available to the originator at the time of issue).

3. Order the Ethics Chit to remain on the file.

4. Take up all the receiver’s Ethics Chits and hold the hearing accordingly.

If the originator is a Secretary or above the Ethics Officer and the receiver visit the Secretary in his Office for the hearing on appointment. But a Secretary or above need not grant the appointment at all if so inclined. In such a case the hearing is held without the originator in the Ethics Office.

No person may be penalized for issuing an Ethics Chit.

This policy letter is retro-active from this date. In other words old chits may be protested as above.

L. RON HUBBARD LRH:emp.rd