link6630 link6631 link6632 link6633 link6634 link6635 link6636 link6637 link6638 link6639 link6640 link6641 link6642 link6643 link6644 link6645 link6646 link6647 link6648 link6649 link6650 link6651 link6652 link6653 link6654 link6655 link6656 link6657 link6658 link6659 link6660 link6661 link6662 link6663 link6664 link6665 link6666 link6667 link6668 link6669 link6670 link6671 link6672 link6673 link6674 link6675 link6676 link6677 link6678 link6679 link6680 link6681 link6682 link6683 link6684 link6685 link6686 link6687 link6688 link6689 link6690 link6691 link6692 link6693 link6694 link6695 link6696 link6697 link6698 link6699 link6700 link6701 link6702 link6703 link6704 link6705 link6706 link6707 link6708 link6709 link6710 link6711 link6712 link6713 link6714 link6715 link6716 link6717 link6718 link6719 link6720 link6721 link6722 link6723 link6724 link6725 link6726 link6727 link6728 link6729 link6730 link6731 link6732 link6733 link6734 link6735 link6736 link6737 link6738 link6739 link6740 link6741 link6742 link6743 link6744 link6745 link6746 link6747 link6748 link6749 link6750 link6751 link6752 link6753 link6754 link6755 link6756 link6757 link6758 link6759
Русская версия

Site search:
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Suppresive Persons, Main Characterisitcs - P650807
- Suppressive Persons, Main Characteristics of (DIV1.DEP3.ETHICS) - P650807

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Подавляющие Личности, Основные Характеристики - И650807-1
- Подавляющие Личности, их Главные Характеристики - И650807-1
CONTENTS SUPPRESSIVE PERSONS,
MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 AUGUST 1965
Remimeo Ethics Hats Executive Hats

SUPPRESSIVE PERSONS,
MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF

It is interesting in the detection of Suppressive Persons that they use “policy” to prevent purpose.

In one org which went into a serious decline a Suppressive Person was in a high position.

Every time org personnel returned from Saint Hill and proposed that the org get going, they were told by this SP that their proposals were “against policy”.

Not one of these people, hearing this, ever alerted to a glaring fact. The SP in this case was renowned for never being able to pass a bulletin, tape or policy letter!

So how would that person have known WHAT was against policy for that person NEVER was known to pass a hat check!

So that person’s statement that, “it’s against policy” was obviously false since the person was incapable of passing hat checks or bulletins and wouldn’t ever have known what any policy was for or against anything.

Thus we see one of the characteristics of an SP is:

1. THE NEGATION OF POLICY WITHOUT KNOWING IT AND THE USE OF “POLICY” TO PREVENT SUCCESS IN SCIENTOLOGY IS THE PRIMARY TOOL OF THE SP AGAINST ORGS.


Dissemination is a prime target of the SP.

Magazines ordinarily have half a dozen SPs on their lines. These people write in and complain about ads. If you don’t watch it these half dozen become “everybody” and the mag is beaten down into not advertising.

“Soft sell” is another recommendation of the SP.

And “build it quietly” and “get only decent people” are all part of this.

When somebody is demanding less reach, that person is an SP.

Therefore we have another characteristic:

2. SPs RECOMMEND INEFFECTIVE DISSEMINATION AND FIND FAULT WITH ANY BEING DONE.


A Suppressive will try to sell off the property or buildings of an org and in one case tried to give them away when temporarily in charge.

3. A SUPPRESSIVE WILL TRY TO GET RID OF AN ORG.


Good staff members are a prime target for SPs. In one org where an SP got a foothold 60% of the staff was gotten rid of and the org almost crashed.

They do it by making people too dissatisfied to produce and so make it impossible for the org to earn.

4. AN SP WILL SEEK TO UPSET AND GET RID OF THE BEST STAFFMEMBERS.


Bad news, particularly if false, is the only comm line of the SP.

The executive who is getting bad news as a steady diet on his lines has SPs about.

5. ENTHETA IS THE SOLE STOCK IN TRADE OF THE SP.


The triumph an SP feels in not getting rid of tilings the auditor has tried to ease is quite malevolent.

6. AN SP IS SATISFIED WITH AUDITING ONLY WHEN HE GETS WORSE.


7. SPs are happy when their pcs get worse and sad when their pcs get better.


8. AN SP IN AN EXAMINER POST WILL ONLY DECLARE RELEASED THE BAD RESULT CASES AND WILL NOT PASS ACTUAL RELEASES BUT WILL ARC BREAK THEM.


9. Covert invalidation is the level of an SP’s social intercourse.


An SP can only restimulate another, he has no power of his own.

10. An SP deals only in restimulation, never easing or erasing.


11. The persons around an SP get so restimulated they can’t detect the real SP.


The whole rationale of the SP is built on the belief that if anyone got better, the SP would be for it as the others could overcome him then.

He is fighting a battle he once fought and never stopped fighting. He is in an incident. Present time people are mistaken by him for past, long gone enemies.

Therefore he never really knows what he is fighting in present time, so just fights.

12.The SP is sure everyone is against him personally and if others became more powerful they would dispose of him.


The SP usually commits continuing overts. These are hidden.

I have had two or three SPs blow up and shout or snarl at me. When I investigated I found, in these cases, they were committing daily crimes of some magnitude.

13. An SP commits hidden overts continuously.


14. Back of a crime you will find SP characteristics.


15. Because an SP uses generalities in his speech “everybody” “they”, etc., the SP is hard to detect.


SPs have an experiential track that is poor. SPs know how to needle and commit overts and hold others back.

When released, the SP has so little decent background experience that he or she has a very hard time.

16. Releasing an SP does not make a worthwhile person. It only makes a person who can now learn to get along in life.

“A cleared cannibal is a cleared cannibal.


”SPs don’t get case gains. Sometimes they pretend them. They are held back by their continuing overts. If we were found by them to be decent, their past conduct would swell up and engulf them.

They are in a continued PTP of their fight with Mankind. And they follow the rule that pcs with PTPs get no case gains.


Real SPs comprise about 2 1/2 per cent of the population. By restimulating others they make another 17 1/2 per cent into Potential Trouble Sources. Therefore about 20% of the population is Ethics type.

We must not allow this 20% to prevent the 80% from crossing the bridge.

We are no enemy of the SP. But he can’t have friends, can he?

So we handle the SP and his PTSs and carry on with our job.

L. RON HUBBARD LRH:mh.cden