We are engaged in piloting through fast clearing.

Using the data and experience of 3D Criss Cross (which remains valid and all mistakes of which can be cleaned up as per this Info Letter) we should get faster results and, more important, obtain a continuing gain on the pc until the pc is clear.

The best locator of the Goals Problem Mass is from goals. On any pc (whose rudiments can be kept in), even pcs being run on 3D Criss Cross, the fastest road to clear is probably as follows:

1. Do a goals assessment.
2. List and nul for an item obtained from the goal found, by complete listing.
3. Oppterm the item found by listing, nulling and finding the oppterm by complete listing.
4. Repeat 1, 2 and 3 many times.

New data which makes this possible is as follows:

1. Listing is auditing.
2. Goals locate more deeply in the Goals Problem Mass than any other line.
3. Other types of line are less accurate and can give the pc more discomfort than goals items.
4. Finding a goal was blocked by out-rudiments, invalidations and missed withholds.
5. What a complete list is has been discovered and tests developed conditionally.
6. Pcs can become upset (given heavy somatics) by incomplete lines and by oppterming wrong items.

In theory if an Item list is handled as a process, it must be completed.

All charge probably does not bleed off a goals list and these tests do not apply to a goals list as (in goals) a pc is facing no mass, only ideas. In items he faces up to mass. Items are charged, not goals. The following conditional tests are applied to Lists of Items (not a goals list) to establish if a list is complete.

1. All tone arm action has ceased by list end, but was present and adequate at list beginning, just as in any repetitive process.
2. By reading the first 12 items of the list back to the pc, as differentiation, no Tone Arm Action is produced. (Use the second 12 for next test.) (No thorough differentiation is done on the list.)
3. The first 12 items of the list produce no great needle action in nulling and all but one or two go out on reading them the first time. (Use the second 12 for next test, third 12 for third test, etc.)
4. Almost all the list vanishes on the first nulling of it. No items grind out.
5. The meter does not respond to a question: “Are there any more terminals?”

Coax the pc into completing the list by these tests. Keep off ARC break reactions by asking for missed withholds and invalidations.

In theory, when the terminal is attained by a goals assessment and a resulting list of items, and when the opposing item is obtained, if both lists were complete, the two items should “blow” and the goal cease to react. This then would make repetitive auditing unnecessary.

The safest action on any case that has been run on 3D Criss Cross is to take any goal ever found on the case and check it out. If it checks out, ignore the former terminal and complete the goals terminal list as per the above five tests and then oppterm it.

3D Criss Cross is a good training ground.

Any new auditor on Routine 3 processes should be put on 3D Criss Cross with Pre- Hav Levels as a source and be made to complete his list, find an item and do a complete oppterm list.

Incomplete listing, invalidations and out-rudiments are the main faults of Routine 3 processes. A new auditor should be cured of them before messing with a goals assessment, which is the touchiest to do and hardest on a case.

Values gained in receiving or giving 3D Criss Cross are great. Values from Routine 3G are probably much greater and much more comfortable.

In doing 3D Criss Cross or Routine 3G omit Differentiation as a step except to stir up the pc for more items or to test the completeness of a list.

A goal is checked (whether new or old) by:

1. Nulling down to one goal.
2. Getting rudiments carefully in.
3. Taking off any invalidations (invalidations when present read the same as the goal or item while the goal or item does not read).
4. Reading the goal, then a goal that went out only after a second nulling of the list, then the goal found, then a nul goal, etc. The goal should continue to read.

A goal or item reads constantly, each time it is said. It reads tick, tick, tick, always the same and every time, providing invalidations are off and rudiments are in.

An item is checked out the same way as a goal.

No item on a complete list should have more than one or two nulling marks after it. If an auditor has to cover a list 25 times to get it nul, it’s laughably incomplete. An auditing supervisor can simply look at a list’s nul marks and tell if it’s complete or not. Too many nul marks equals an incomplete list always.

A complete list, in theory, just fades away and leaves an item.

Perhaps an oppterm list will just fade out and the original item and goal will vanish.

Routine 3G is an effort to exploit the assess to clear phenomena without auditing any items and to keep the pc continually gaining without slumps.

Routine 3 failed only because of out-rudiments, poor meter handling, bad TRs and Model Session. It never failed because of its theory or technology.

It is recommended that, when an auditor is skilled, the pc be placed on Routine 3G regardless of anything found by 3D Criss Cross.

Ignore all previously found or run items. Take up only a goal found (that still checks out as above) or a new goals list.

If a goals list has been lost, reconstruct it by taking invalidations off the subject of goals and having the pc list newly.

Goals lists run from 100 to 1000, sometimes more. Item lists seldom run less than 300, usually more.

Use the same goals list for Step 4 of Routine 3G. Add to it. Nul the whole thing again. Don’t try to get all TA action and charge off a goals list.

Always get all action and charge off an items list.

The steps of Routine 3D Criss Cross now are:

1. Get a Pre-Hav Level by usual Pre-Hav Assessment.
2. List for the item.
3. Test for completeness with above Completeness tests.
4. Complete if not complete.
5. Nul list to one item.
6. Check out item (as above).
7. Oppterm the item at once.
8. Test oppterm list for completeness. # Nul oppterm list.
9. Check out item.

Put anything found on a Line Plot.

The steps of Routine 3G are:

1. Do or recover a goals list.
2. Nul the list to one goal.
3. Check out the goal.
4. List for an item from the goal. (Use the wording: “Who or what would want to [goal]?”)
5. Test for completeness (as above).
6. Complete list if not complete. (Do 5 and 6 until the list is complete.)
7. Nul the list to one item.
8. Check out the item.
9. Oppterm list the item. (Use: “Who or what would oppose [item]?”)
10. Test for completeness of list.
11. Complete list. (Do 10 and 11 until list is complete.)
12. Nul list.
13. Check out item.
14. Assess for a new goal as above and do each of these steps in order. Keep an accurate Line Plot record of all goals and items found.

Repairing a case that has had bad or erroneous assessment or running of items on Routine 3 or 3A or 3D or 3D Criss Cross is done by the Routine 3G steps above. The errors should vanish.

Note that the word “want” is used to get an item list from a goal. “Who or What would want to....... (goal).......?” (Not “Who or What would [goal]?”)

A pc can be coaxed into completing a list by differentiation, which consists of asking him “Would a (item) want to (goal)?” for each item he or she has listed. But only differentiate a few until pc is going again.

Don’t Tone 40 ack items or goals a pc gives you. It stops the pc by completing the cycle. Just murmur at him or her when you get a goal or item. Ask the question that is getting items only as a prompt when pc runs down. Not while a pc is talking goals or items. Try to get several goals or items for one question. Coax the pc. Keep the missed withholds picked up.

If the pc gets a “dirty needle” in listing 3D Criss Cross, an earlier item is wrong. (This is a pc “needle pattern”.) A wrong item found constitutes a missed withhold. Backtrack to earlier items. A wrong goal found can cause a “dirty needle”. Otherwise a “dirty needle” is caused by missed withholds. If you can’t clean up a “dirty needle” with missed withhold questions, a goal or item was wrong and you had better backtrack to it at once, no matter what else you were doing.

The way to do it is re-check all items on the Line Plot and correct the earliest item that won’t now check out (unless it and its oppterm blew, of course).

You will receive more data on Routine 3G as it is found.

The Modifier is part, it seems, of the oppterm so its use is dropped. It is not found now.

DO NOT LET ROUTINE 3G BE RUN AS THE FIRST ROUTINE 3 PROCESS BYANY INEXPERIENCED AUDITOR. LET AUDITORS BECOME PERFECT USING ROUTINE 3D CRISS CROSS AS CONTAINED HEREIN. A goals assessment is tougher than 3D Criss Cross and goals are more easily invalidated than items. Further Routine 3G should clear off any errors run into a case by 3D Criss Cross. Therefore don’t train with the only cure. 3D Criss Cross does well with cases too! Train Auditors to do Routine 3 processes with Routine 3D Criss Cross from Pre-Hav Levels. Only when they’re perfect, let them go to more advanced routines. Routine 3D Criss Cross can be run on staffs and HGC pcs with great advantage to the pc and no unremediable risk to the pc.

Requisite to run Routine 3D Criss Cross is good gains with Prepchecking and the CCHs.

We have developed a good process to graduate the auditor to clearing without fouling up pcs too badly in Routine 3D Criss Cross. And the pcs will win too if it is well and thoroughly done.

All this should be good news to people whose goals have been found.