Русская версия

Site search:
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Potential Trouble Source Routing (DIV1.DEP3.ETHICS) - P651014

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Направление ПИНа - И651014-1
CONTENTS POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE ROUTING REVIEW AUDITOR
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 OCTOBER 1965
Remimeo All Staff Ethics Hat Tech Hats Qual Hats Income Hats IMPORTANT

POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE ROUTING

The Ethics Officer, when receiving a person who has roller coastered (case unproved then dropped), must route that person to Review. Review only must locate the correct Suppressive Person, repeat the correct SP, the right SP.

Review then states:

1. Who the SP is (or who they are if more than one);

2. That good indicators came in and stayed in visibly when the SP (or SPs) was found.

Review then sends the person to Ethics.

Ethics must require the person as per policy to handle or disconnect.

If the person will not handle or disconnect, the person is sent again to Review as the right SP has NOT been found.

Further UNTIL THE PERSON HAS PAID IN CASH FOR THE REVIEW SEARCH AND DISCOVERY Ethics may not declare the person no longer PTS. (The reason for this is that the person will not pay if the wrong suppressive is found.) HGC Auditors, similarly must send a PTS to Review not Ethics.

Supervisors must send any student PTS only to Review.

Review always sends to Ethics but ONLY when the right SP has been found and indicated.

REVIEW AUDITOR

The Review Auditor uses “Search and Discovery” as will be covered in an HCO B. If this is not to hand, simply find the right SP, indicate it to the person and watch the good indicators come in.

PTSs may not be handled in ANY other way.

The routing is not from Ethics to the Chaplain. Ethics does not route to the Chaplain.

L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.cden