While there could be many many oddities classifiable as outpoints, those selected and named as such are major in importance whereas others are minor.

„Wrong Source“ is the other side of the coin of wrong target.

Information taken from wrong source, orders taken from the wrong source, gifts or materiel taken from wrong source all add up to eventual confusion and possible trouble.

Unwittingly receiving from a wrong source can be very embarrassing or confusing, so much so that it is a favorite intelligence trick. Dept D in East Germany, the Dept of Disinformation, has very intricate methods of planting false information and disguising its source.

Technology can come from wrong source. For instance Leipzig University’s school of psychology and psychiatry opened the door to death camps in Hitler’s Germany. Using drugs these men apparently gave Hitler to the world as their puppet. They tortured, maimed and slaughtered over 12,000,000 Germans in death camps. At the end of World War II these extremists formed the „World Federation of Mental Health,“ which enlisted the American Psychiatric Association and the American Medical Association and established „National Associations for Mental Health“ over the world, cowed news media, smashed any new technology and became the sole advisors to the US government on „mental health, education and welfare“ and the appointers of all health ministers through the civilized world and through their graduate Pavlov dominated Russian communist „mental health.“ This source is so wrong that it is destroying Man, having already destroyed scores of millions. (All statements given here are documented.)

Not only taking data from wrong source but officialdom from it can therefore be sufficiently aberrated as to result in planetary insanity.

In a lesser level, taking a report from a known bad hat and acting upon it is the usual reason for errors made in management.

When two statements are made on one subject which are contrary to each other, we have „contrary facts.“

Previously we classified this illogic as a falsehood, since one of them must be false.

But in doing data analysis one cannot offhand distinguish which is the false fact. Thus it becomes a special outpoint.

„They made a high of $12,000 that week“ and „They couldn’t pay staff“ occurring in the same time period gives us one or both as false. We may not know which is true but we do know they are contrary and can so label it.

In interrogation this point is so important that anyone giving two contrary facts becomes a prime suspect for further investigation. „I am a Swiss citizen“ as a statement from someone who has had a German passport found in his baggage would be an example.

When two „facts“ are contrary or contradictory we may not know which is true but we do know they can’t both be true.

Issued by the same org, even from two different people in that org, two contradictory „facts“ qualifies as an outpoint.

These two will be found useful in analysis.