Русская версия

Site search:
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Routine 3, an Actual Line Plot No. 2 (GPM) - B630504

CONTENTS ROUTINE 3
AN ACTUAL LINE PLOT NO. 2
ADD ITEMS* FUTURE CORRECTIONS
::HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 MAY 1963 Central Orgs Missions URGENT

ROUTINE 3
AN ACTUAL LINE PLOT NO. 2

(Additions to HCOB 28 Apr. 63, AN ACTUAL LINE PLOT)

ADD ITEMS*

On the 3rd page in this HCOB, 28 Apr. 63 just below the Reliable Item BEINGS WHO ARE HAVING A GAME, add the Oppterm RI, HAVING A GAME.

Below the terminal RI, A BEING WHO WOULD HATE TO HAVE A GAME add the terminal RI, A BEING WHO WOULD NOT WANT TO HAVE A GAME.

The above two were missed in copying the line plot.

Add the level GLEE below ENTHUSIASTIC in both upper and lower “dwindlings.”

This actual line plot was completely run except for the levels Absolute to Vital in the lower dwindling which were put in from another GPM.

FUTURE CORRECTIONS

Since running this actual Goals Problem Mass TO HAVE A GAME, in running out other GPMs a great deal of additional data has emerged both as to the character of a GPM, its source and how to run one, as I am working very hard on technical. The job is very nearly complete as to research, though it has been pretty grim facing up to this totally unknown area of the reactive mind. I acted as a pc on it because I didn’t know if a body would live through it. It does — but care is needed in handling a GPM while in a body and great accuracy is required or the pc will gather mass and feel strain on heart and lung machinery.

I am now assembling and cross-checking all levels of RIs and sequences of goals.

Practically all the material is in sight but the speedy need of it is very difficult to meet. I have done, with Mary Sue’s help, about a decade of research since December last with Mary Sue as the auditor and myself as a pc.

My RR is practically indestructible and my confront is good on this. Therefore, and only therefore could the job be done. Other pcs’ RRs are too weak for research and their confront is not up to it.

Therefore I had to guinea pig it. This doesn’t make me any hero but it has been fortunate for us that I could do this as nobody currently under processing has come close to the actual pattern and without it we would be stopped.

I did not realize the vitalness of the data or the weakness of RRs until March. Because it was I who went through it, I completely underestimated the ability of the average pc to confront it and find RIs.

Thus a whole technology of running has had to be developed (Directive and Random Listing) to cope with these factors of poor RRs and low confront. So this burden was added on to research and therefore my data release has fallen behind.

I have been struck by the importance attached to this material. Cables and telexes have been coming in demanding the data.

I am putting out the material as fast as I can and it should all be released shortly.

What auditors do not realize is that any finding of RIs at any level in a GPM releases charge. If RIs are bypassed the pc, however, is uncomfortable or ARC breaky.

If this story of finding this pattern and the GPMs is incredible, the actual story of the GPMs is even more so. The data entirely changes our line of attack on public dissemination, more toward the Dianetic approach but still within the framework of Scientology and the human spirit.

There are a very few more RIs in a GPM than shown in TO HAVE A GAME. The upper dwindling (top oppterm down) is apparently always ABLY or INGABLY, never any other word form.

The lower dwindling (goal down) is apparently always ABLE or INGABLE.

This is not shown in the Line Plot of 28 Apr. 63 as it was learned from other GPMs the following week.

The lowest oppterm is not correct. For reasons to be covered later this oppterm should be something else.

The whole of the terminal side should always be NIX _____________not NO

More ancient cultures have more emphatic negatives.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder