(Ref:
Per HCOB 15 Oct 74 Cramming Over Out-Ruds, a Cramming Officer must not try to cram over out-ruds. Despite this, there still have been instances of persons being “handled” in cramming without the ruds having been gotten in, so no handling got done at all.
To begin any cramming of anyone, assess the ruds including overts, invalidation and evaluation and fly any that read. Then when you have cleared up the reads to F/Ns and have an F/N, begin the exact cramming orders indicated.
You can mimeo a small form on which to assess these and mark reads which will save time. The form would look like this:
“Do you have……
or,
“On (subject), do you have……
“Has there been any……
The Cramming Officer would assess on the form above and clip it to the worksheets.
Misdone crammings and failure to fly the ruds in cramming will mess up staff members, and undisclosed overts and withholds will prevent any gain, not just in auditing but in Word Clearing or cramming or other Qual corrective actions.
Resistance to cramming, protest of cramming or natter about cramming, or other Qual corrective actions are indicative of out-ruds, especially overts and withholds against cramming or Qual or on the subject on which the cramming order was written.
These symptoms of resistance or natter can also stem from having been crammed over out-ruds in the past, or having been mishandled in cramming.
The way to handle someone who has been crammed over out-ruds in the past is to assess the following and fly each reading line to F/N:
“Have you been crammed over….
If someone is nattery about Cramming, Qual correction actions, or Qual, use the assessment above on the subject of their complaint. e.g. you could assess: “Have you been Word Cleared over?”
If the above does not resolve the matter fully, use the Cramming Repair Assessment List (HCOB 2 Jun 78R), or other specific list such as the Word Clearing Correction List (WCCL).
Because the Cramming Officer is required to do these actions, he or she must get checked out on how to do them. Possibly a reason why some did not fly the ruds despite HCOB 15 Oct 74 Cramming Over Out-Ruds, is that the Cramming Officer did not know how to fly ruds and had not gotten himself trained to do so, then either didn’t fly ruds before he attempted to do the cramming order, or did not do the cramming order at all “because the ruds were out.” Both of these errors show an effect attitude that no real Cramming Officer (or Scientologist for that matter), would be guilty of. Cramming Officers get tech in and being applied, staff members successful and winning on their post and are therefore very causative.
A Cramming Officer must get checked out on flying ruds and overts as these are vital tech of the cramming hat. If a classed auditor, he must get checked out on use of correction lists such as the Cramming Repair Assessment List, WCCL, etc. Failure to check out on and use the tech of the post is an ethics matter.
The worksheets (W/Ses) of all such actions (i.e. ruds, Word Clearing, crammings, Cramming Repair Lists, Product Debug Assessments and any other Qual corrective action), are put in the pc folder and sent to the Case Supervisor (C/S). The C/S will correct any out-tech or failure to fully handle, and in the case of no F/N at Exams or other out-tech, red tags the folder, until the matter is fully repaired.
These worksheets must be complete, accurate and legible. In the case of a non F/N exam or other bad indicator, these have rush priority and must be handled fast. All the rules regarding worksheets apply to cramming and any other Qual corrective actions.
Someone may wonder if he needs to get a C/S to fly the ruds before doing so in a cramming action. The answer is: no. You do not need to get the pc’s folder to the C/S before you fly the ruds in cramming. To do so would make an unnecessary delay, and you don’t need a C/S to fly somebody’s ruds.
The C/S (Case Supervisor instruction) is contained in this issue, and that is what you do.
Sometimes a staff member has been known to have been started on and left incomplete on several different actions. e.g. the staff member is started on a cramming order, but before this is complete, someone starts doing a Crashing Misunderstood handling on him, they end for lunch and after lunch someone tries to start yet another action on the staff member. This is a serious situation indeed and it could be enough to spin somebody. So it is mandatory that before starting an action, you must check the folder first. Cramming orders and flying ruds in cramming and other Qual corrective actions do not require C/S OK before doing them as this would put an unnecessary and arbitrary delay on the line, and could be used as an excuse not to do the action. (e.g. “I couldn’t fly his ruds because I didn’t have a C/S to ‘fly the ruds’, so I didn’t do anything.”) But since one would not start a new cycle in the middle of another incomplete cycle, and would not try to fly ruds or word clear over out-Int or out-lists (provided these really were out and not just a false or protest read), the folder must be checked by the person who is going to do the action (this only takes a minute to do).
Before starting a Cramming or other Qual Corrective Action, look in the folder to ensure the person isn’t in the middle of another Qual Corrective Action, or C/Sed to get a flubbed action repaired. After the cramming or other Qual Corrective Action, send the folder to the Case Supervisor with legible worksheets on what you did and the exam form.
If a person has been “crammed” or has had other Qual corrective actions and has gotten worse, or made no improvement, then get all Qual corrective actions done on the person FESed by the Case Supervisor, and a program and C/S to repair these, and get that program done. Comm Ev anyone who interrupts or cross-orders or prevents such a program from being done, as that would be suppressive. Such a program has the priority of repairing a flubbed session and the folder is red tagged, until handled.
There are several new Qual corrective actions as well as all the earlier tools of cramming. These produce spectacular results when done correctly. Use this tech to make greatly enhanced staff members.
Your cramming will be many times more effective and popular if you do it with the correct tech.
You can mimeo a small form on which to assess these and mark reads which will save time. The form would look like this:
“Do you have……
or,
“On (subject). do you have……
“Has there been any……
The Cramming Officer would assess on the form above and clip it to the worksheets.
The way to handle someone who has been crammed over out-ruds in the past is to assess the following and fly each reading line to F/N:
“Have you been crammed over……
If someone is nattery about Cramming, Qual Correction actions, or Qual, use the assessment above on the subject of their complaint. e.g. you could assess: “Have you been word cleared over _____?”
If the above does not resolve the matter fully, use the Cramming Repair Assessment List (HCOB 2 Jun 78R), or other specific list such as the Word Clearing Correction List (WCCL).