Ref-- HCO PL 19 Jan. 66 III DANGER CONDITION RESPONSIBILITIES OF DECLARING
Modifies: HCOB 19 Jan. 66 DANGER CONDITIONS TECHNICAL DATA FOR REVIEW
These issues remain cancelled:
Handling staff members, students, auditors, pcs or field personnel with disagreements does not always resolve readily with misunderstood word handling. There are other sources for disagreements.
HCO Policy Letter of 19 Jan. 66, DANGER CONDITION, RESPONSIBILITIES OF DECLARING, states that an executive declaring a Danger condition 4 & should make an effort to find the disagreement on all persons found responsible for a Danger condition. " There is also apparently a relationship between a person with a low leadership survey and Ions of disagreements.
A Disagreement Check consists of the following steps which are done by a Class III or above auditor. This rundown can also be done on a preclear in the HGC as part of his program. The rundown requires C/S clearance. (Ref: HCOB 28 Sept. 82, C/S Series 115, MIXING RUNDOWNS AND REPAIRS)
Fly all ruds.
Disagreement List One (DL-1)
Clear each of the words in the following question and list, then assess it Method 5 (assess the whole list and take up reading items in order of longest reads):
"ARE THERE ANY DISAGREEMENTS WITH:
A. A SENIOR
B. YOUR POST
C. THE ORG
K. SOME FORMER SIMILAR SUBJECT
L. SOME OTHER SIMILAR SUBJECT OR AREA"
Note: If K or L reads, get what the subject or area is before going on to the next step.
This assessment will locate most organizational disagreements but the C/S may add additional subjects to suit the case at his discretion.
Give the pc an R-factor that you are going to take up any and all disagreements and handle one at a time. Clear and ask, "DO YOU HAVE ANY DISAGREEMENT ON (item from DL-1)?" Get the disagreement stated briefly. Note any SFs, Fs, LFs, BDs when the question is asked and as pc says the disagreement. If pc gives a disagreement and gets no reads or BD, ask, "DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER DISAGREEMENT ON (item from DL-I)?" If still no reading disagreements coming up, check the item itself for False and Protest and handle accordingly. Do not run a nonreading disagreement in the next step.
At this point pre-OTs, OT III and above should be handled per HCOB 4 July 79, CONFIDENTIAL-HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs.
Clear the words in the following list and assess it Method 3, handling each reading item with Two-way Comm earlier-similar to F/N.
Disagreement List Two (DL-2)
"IN RELATION TO THAT DISAGREEMENT IS THERE:
1. AN ALTERED SEQUENCE
2. OMITTED DATA
3. DROPPED-OUT TIME
4. A FALSEHOOD
5. AN ALTERED IMPORTANCE
6. A WRONG TARGET
7. A WRONG SOURCE
8. CONTRARY FACTS
9. ADDED TIME
10. ADDED 1. NAPPLICABLE DATA
11. AN INCORRECTLY INCLUDED DATUM
12. ASSUMED "IDENTITIES" WHICH WERE NOT IDENTICAL
13. ASSUMED "SIMILARITIES" WHICH WERE NOT SIMILAR OR THE SAME CLASS OF THING
14. ASSUMED DIFFERENCES WHICH WERE NOT DIFFERENT
15. AN INCONSISTENCY
16. A MISUNDERSTOOD WORD OR SYMBOL (Handle with Word Clearing Method 4 to F/N.)
18. CROSS ORDERS
If the disagreement has not been cleaned up to VG's after completing this assessment and handling reading items, the list (DL-2) may be run through again to catch anything missed on the first assessment.
Clear and ask, "IS THERE ANY OTHER DISAGREEMENT ON (item from DL-1)?" Handle any reading disagreements given as per Steps Three and Four until the pc has no more disagreements on that subject and F/N VGI's.
Clear and run, "IS THERE ANYTHING ON (DL-1 item just run above) YOU AGREE WITH?" Two-way Comm any reading answer earlier-similar to F/N.
Take up the next best reading item from DL-1 and handle as per Steps Three to Six to F/N VGI's and no more disagreements on that subject.
Handle all remaining reading items in order of reads until all reading items on DL-1 have been handled fully as per Steps Three to Six above.
Reassess the Disagreement List One, which should now be an F/Ning list. Any reading items should be handled in order of greatest reads as per Steps Three to Seven until DL-1 is an F/Ning list with VGIs.
Qual personnel are referred to HCO PL 28 Dec. 67, QUAL SENIOR DATUM, when handling persons sent for Disagreement Checks. It is up to the Qual Sec or Dir Personnel Enhancement to interview the person and ascertain the correct handling and correction. Qual is not obliged to follow any orders re the handling of students, staff or pcs, but they are expected to fully handle and correct each person properly.
The EP of the Disagreement Check is an F/Ning list with VGls and the pc free of disagreements on the subjects handled.
Standardly audited and C/Sed and used as part of a full Danger-handling program, this rundown provides an invaluable tool for cleaning up persons who have gotten into a Danger condition.