The following letter from Ian Tampion outlines a common trouble with CTH. The pc doesn’t answer the question!
This comes really from running it on a pc who isn’t that high in grades. The pc can’t yet hear and answer a question.
L.R.H. Assoc Sec Perth
I have heard something ”on the grapevine” about CTH which if correct (as it sounds) will be something that is pretty uniformly being goofed, at least in Australia.
It comes with the question ”What should be near (body part)?” — as I understand it you want what should be near it, that is, the guy has a headache, body part ”head”, should be near it is ”no headache”. In other words, is the ”should be near part” the absence of or reverse to, the condition being healed?
I was formerly taking anything that seemed to make sense to the pc so I bet plenty of other people have too — amazingly enough it’s even worked quite well too!